Latest Factchecks:
FACT CHECK: Did BVAS glitch disrupt the voting exercise in Onitsha?
FACT CHECK: Does this video show unknown gunmen attacking security personnel during the 2025 Anambra governorship election?
FACT CHECK: Old image shared hours after opening of polls with the hashtag AnambraDecides’25
FACT CHECK: Did an Anambra LGA Chairman Disrupt Elections with Police?
FACT CHECK: Viral Video Claiming ‘Massive Influx of Cash’ in Anambra Election
FACT CHECK: Old Photo Falsely Linked to Violence in the Anambra Election
FACT CHECK: Anambra election has hardly exceeded 22% voter turnout
FACT CHECK: Did Soludo ‘Emptied Anambra Purse’ to Buy Votes for APGA?
FACT CHECK: Was there an approval to vote without a voter’s card in the 2025 Anambra guber poll?
FACT CHECK: Did the YPP candidate step down for Soludo?
FACT CHECK: Two of Chukwuma Soludo’s mayors caught with N750 million cash each?
FACT CHECK: Did Tinubu withdraw support for Soludo?
FACT CHECK: A CSO group uncovered APGA’s secret camp in Ihiala LGA with plans to use fake police to rig Anambra election?
FACT CHECK: An intelligence report has uncovered how APC’s Nicholas Ukachukwu planned to disrupt the election with thugs and fake police?
FACT CHECK: Did the Police Restrict Vehicular Movement from 12 am to 6 pm?
FACT CHECK: Did NYSC members reject APC’s Nicholas Ukachukwu’s N10 million rigging offer ahead of 2025 Anambra guber poll?
FACT CHECK: Did Soludo Instruct Principals in All Anambra Secondary Schools to Compile Teachers’ Details and PVCs?
FACT CHECK: Did Four Lawmakers Defect to APC in Anambra State?
FACT CHECK: Did APC candidate, Ukwachukwu donate ₦3 million to flood victims in Anambra State?

Where credible evidence is provided and an error worthy of correction is found, CDD Factcheck shall make the correction and apologize for the error made and republish the new fact. We will promptly clarify, correct or update the story. In the spirit of transparency, explanations will be offered on what warranted the change, why it was made, and when it was made. Please ensure to contact us on any of our public communication channels if any of our publications are deemed unbiased, not evidence-based, or devoid of the principles of balance, transparency and truth. You may independently – and without prior approval from us – report any violation to the IFCN. We do hope, however, that we remain your first point of contact so that amendments can quickly be made where necessary.
Our research, writing, and editing processes are a meticulous passage through a conveyor belt of vetting processes of the claims. This is to guarantee a rigorous verification exercise based on strong evidential support for, or refutation of, the basis of a claim. The end process of the preparation for publication is a mandatory standards review, where the edited work goes through a final check to ensure that it satisfies all the internal protocols of determining truthfulness.